Loading…
Thursday July 9, 2026 12:00pm - 12:55pm NZST
Gaston Bachelard has received increasing interest in analytic philosophy (Massimiliano Simons and Matteo Vagelli, 2021; Brenner, 2015; Chimisso, 2024), yet it remains controversial whether Bachelard simply develops the neo-Kantian philosophy of science (Tiles, 1984; Guo, 2019; Panero, 2021) or breaks with this tradition to establish a novel approach (Souto, 2022). In this paper, I argue, through a reading of The Philosophy of No (1940), that Bachelard’s philosophy of science is best understood as a movement away from Léon Brunschvicg’s neo-Kantian critical idealism towards a phenomenological account of science inspired by Edmund Husserl. First, I contrast Brunschvicg’s and Husserl’s divergent modifications of Kantian doctrines, principally regarding the cognitive capacity to grasp noumena. Second, I trace in The Philosophy of No how Bachelard inherits Brunschvicg’s neo-Kantian concerns for the autonomy, progress, and demystifying role of science while adapting these commitments into a variation of Husserl’s metaphysics of history. With this background in mind, I argue that Bachelard’s philosophy of science constitutes a pedagogical doctrine primarily aimed at transforming those initiated in Kantian doctrine into practitioners of a phenomenology of science.   
Speakers
avatar for Jacob Ritz

Jacob Ritz

University of Queensland
Jacob Ritz is a casual academic in German and mathematics and a PhD student at the University of Queensland, where he studied German, French, and pure mathematics. His current research interests lie in nineteenth- and twentieth-century German and French metaphysics, particularly at... Read More →
Thursday July 9, 2026 12:00pm - 12:55pm NZST
MSB1.02

Attendees (6)


Log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

Share Modal

Share this link via

Or copy link