AAP 2026 CONFERENCE

Much of my recent research has centred on the polemic between Henri Bergson and Gaston Bachelard. In particular, I have focused on the notions of continuity and discontinuity within the two philosopher’s work. I have found that recent Bergsonian scholarship has, at times, dismissed Bachelard uncharitably. I ask, however, whether such a hasty dismissal of Bachelard is necessary, let alone justified. My argument is that Bachelard understood Bergson’s work at a depth greater than what he is often credited, and therefore, he provides a critique that warrants a deeper level of engagement from Bergsonians in return. My aim here is not to discredit Bergson so much as it is to develop an interpretation of Bergson that has sincerely engaged with Bachelard’s novel and insightful critique.

Both philosophers present compelling philosophies of temporality that, at the very least, generate an interesting polemic. At most however, I have found that a sincere engagement with the tension found in their opposition has led to a deeper appreciation of both. Personally, I have not concluded my research and my ultimate position on the matter remains indefinite. That being said, I am certain that Bergsonian scholars will benefit from an encounter with Bachelard’s critique.